Philosophy of Hugo Bedau and Ernest vd. Haag Essay

Philosophy of Hugo Bedau and Ernest vd. Haag - Essay ExampleSoon he is called to turn out for the sins of his nature.The ultimate punishment for mans heinous crimes has continued to raise differing views in the civilized society. Hugo Bedau upholds the American Civil Liberties Union that death penalty inherently violates the constitutional ostracize against cruel and unusual punishment and the guarantee of due process of law and the equal egis of the laws. This idea is based on the premise that the state should non usurp the power of taking the lives of human beings especially in a premeditated and with ceremony under the guise of law. The punishment of death for a cracking offense is frowned upon as too harsh, freaky and arbitrary to be constitutionally acceptable. He believes that this form of punishment is still based on the early eld of barbarism when other forms of corporal punishment were acceptable. The killing of a person has no place in a civil humane society because i t wastes the resources of the courts, the sound counsels, juries and other correctional personnel. Executions impart to the society the unmistakable message that human life no longer deserves respect and that homicide is legitimate when justified by prosaic concerns. He has also added that threat of severe punishment cannot deter criminals especially ones who are in the drug trade. If however, long term imprisonment is severe overflowing to cause any rational person not to commit violent crimes.Bedau also demonstrated that death penalty violates the constitutional guarantee of the equal protection of the law as it is applied randomly at best and discriminatorily at worst. He also added that it is imposed disproportionately upon those whose victims are white, on offenders who are mint of color and on the poor and uneducated. He based this argument on the misdistribution of the implementation of the punishment on criminals whose offenses were against white victims because statistic s would show that in 2005, of the 60 inmates who were executed, 41 were white and only 19 were black.Ernest van den Haag, for his part believes that capital punishment likely serves as a deterrent factor to the counselling of a crime because of the common fear of death. Criminals, although not scientifically supported have a strong and palpable fear of the capital punishment on its severe form. There are murderers who are not hindered by the threat of imprisonment but death as a finality serves to inflict a sense of foreboding, knowing that after death there is only void. More so, death penalty certainly deters the murderer who is executed. He further argues that the abolishment of this capital punishment is prayed upon by pro-life activists like Bedau with the argument that there is misdistribution between the guilty and the innocent. He reasoned out that Bedaus argument of misdistribution of punishment is remote to its justice or morality as punishments are imposed on the perso n, not on racial or economic groups. In short, equality in the appropriation of the punishment is less important than justice. The long term imprisonment preferred by pro-life activists is a costly maintenance which cannot inflict the salmagundi of fear that the possibility of death brings. There is a likely chance of escape in prison. In some third world countries, the despicable criminals quite a enjoy being afforded food while being