Migrants Culture in Host Country

migratorys subtlety in armament rude Culture is in general accepted way of doing activities in a society which includes beliefs, symbols, values, behaviour and loving organization. Migrants adopt and mix with new sapet-gardening since finis change in inevitable. There ar certain arguments for maintaining unmatcheds native acculturation in a new ground. However, it is a defended that migrants should adopt the host countrys culture. This essay will consider the arguments for persist ining or not retaining ones culture in the new country.To begin with, tribe have developed their own way of living in the country of origin and they are wonted(a) to doing activities in the local shipway. One of habits is the inclined(p)ness styles. Migrants are usually optic aged people who find it difficult to adopt new slipway of cooking be caseful they are dod to and experience in their handed-down ways. To mark the special events celebrated back at home, food is cooked as it is do at home country. For instance, cook islanders cook in earth oven which gives a sense of togetherness and feeling for there culture (Manderson, 1986).Therefore, the migrants continue with their traditional ways to keep the culture alive and enjoy the same taste as home country. However, it is not always possible to practise such cooking in foreign countries. Migrants usually rent a flat where give is not always available. Place where it is vacant, it is prohibited to dig others compound. Lighting out-of-doors fires in city area would create problems to residents, ringing of fire scandalise and even pollution which is a major benchmark in urban centres.To add another point, the visitors more from the host country who will choose food they are used to eating such as those prepared in grill and electric appliances. For example, to serve island food to European would be dishonour to their culture (Manderson, 1986). As a result, migrants strongly destiny to fit to host cooking s tyle to overcome such problem. Another ethnical aspect which is argued on is traditional ceremonies and festival. The emigrants retain these practises as one need to perform a ritual (which includes births, deaths and marriage) in the traditional to fulfil the requirements.For example, Indian migrants celebrate Diwali (Hindu festival of lights) all over the world. . Constant practise of the ceremonies stimulate the dominant group to adopt the changes such as in circumstance of Fiji where Prophet Mohammeds Birthday is given a public spend as the Muslims (a minority group in Fiji) brought the festival during indentured system. On the other hand, it is difficult to perform such religious activities since it may cause distraction to host people or its value is not accepted in the new society. For instance, holiday given in home country is not observed in the host country.Moreover, the resource (offerings and ornaments) are not available in the country of migration. For instance, Fij i Indians are not able to process with fire crackers because it is embargo goods (The Fiji Times, 1st November 2008, p. 1). Another example is that endemic Fijians kill cattle during death ceremony at home, but in the most developed countries, animal can only be killed in abattoirs. Consequently, this hindrance prevents the migrants to practise their culture in other countries. These constraints compel them to equal the host culture.The next cultural feature which the migrants retain is the actors line. Migrants retain their language to maintain the identity of ethnicity and pass the language to younger generations. Knowing ones own language, the individual can read the religious scripts which are mostly written in vernacular. Words used in comment not always carry the same meaning as in the original writing. Maintaining the language enable the person to better communicate with people of home country. Thus, for these reasons the migrants preserve the native language.On the oth er side, it is very burning(prenominal) for the person to understand the language of host culture to communicate and socialise with the people. Understanding the host language prevents communication breakdown between 2 groups of people. (Clifford, 1973). Situation where communication is a problem, the migrants will encounter culture gust and segregation in the society. Moreover, if person understand the host language, it would be easier to use the facilities such as railway timetables where directions are written in the host language.In conclusion, there are strong reasons as why to retain or why not to retain ones culture in the host country. However, a person needs to change the traditional culture and adopt the new ways to be adopted in the new society. A changing culture will enable a person to overcome culture shock and segregation. It is strongly argued that a person should change the culture and adopt the new ways of living. Every culture is susceptible to change therefor e, a person should be flexible comme il faut to adopt new ways.