Anthropology Fossil Determination, Explanation, and Analysis

Anthropology 2- particular CREDIT ASSIGNMENT\n\n send out 1:\n dodo 1 displays characteristics of Australopithecus aethiopicus of West Lake Turkana, Kenya. This skull shows the explicit characteristics of a precise sharp mesial crest on the top of the skull, a really wide skull in the typeface argona, and an extremely prognathic begin skull and jaw bea. The cranial potentiality likewise appears to be shrimpyer, suggesting that it is of the previous hominids.\n\nfogy 2 shows hilltop ridges and a slight sagittal crest reconciled with serviceman erectus. The most defining characteristic, however, is the movement of nuchal torus, a projection of work up at the back of the skull where muscles are attached to hold the question up, suggesting a consistently two-footed creature.\n\nFossil 3 is a small skull showing no sagittal crest or nuchal torus. There are forehead ridges apparent and the face is sparingly prognathic. The skull most well resembles the skull akin tha t of the Taung child (Jurmain 203). The skull of the Taung child, a renewing known as the willowy australopithecine, or A. africanus, exhibits smaller brainiac capacity, accounting for the smaller skull.\n\nThe quartern fossil has a small skull be conveys the characteristics of Homo sapien, thusly may be a child. At the top of the skull, the attire has not in fully practice together, consistent with children, and very unripened Homo sapien. The teeth are very small only if are shovel-shaped like advanced(a) Homos teeth, change to tear and chew softer foods than those eaten by earlier Homo and untimely(a) hominids. The skull shows little to no prognathism consistent with humans.\n\nSTATION 2:\nFossil 1 at this come out showed postorbital constriction, excess bone cigarette the eyebrows protecting the eyes. The skull showed slight prognathism, which is the jutting of the jaw and lower skull. I predicted that the skull was Homo erectus; however, I famed that the African form, Homo ergaster, characteristically shows postorbital constriction whereas Homo erectus does not.\n\nFossil 2 showed less prognathism, a skull to a greater extent closely resembling raw Homo. However, the brow ridges present were to a greater extent pronounced that in moderne Homo. The small shovel-shaped teeth also are representative of an early Homo sapien because they ate more cooked vegetation and meat, their teeth were utilize less for the grinding of hard, toffee vegetation. The fossil most closely displays the characteristics of Cro-Magnon, or Homo sapiens sapiens (Jurmain 281).\n\nSTATION 3:\nThe first mandible is very robust and shows extreme molarization,...If you privation to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.