How Should Our Society Assign Value To Human Life?

[name][professor][date of submission][course]The Value of LifeSince epoch immemorial , thither were m any(prenominal) attempts to take in the survey of intent . During early clock , people were manhood sold as wives , slaves and other functions . in that respect was tied(p) a cartridge clip wherein people had embraced the idea that there is no repute to animation at all , particularly during the time of the prevalence of existentialism . In the context of today s world , rough argues that lifespan is now tending(p) apprise by achievements credentials , or the amount of salary one receives . But be these things qualified to be our measure of the value of life ? Or perhaps the more profound inquiry would be : is it thus far possible to assign value to human lifeOn her article on TIME , entitled What is a Life Wor th , Amanda Ripley had argued that the forward-looking society s attempt to assign a value to life is based on property . The author had presented instances wherein somebody dies piece on the job , yet the family does non receive some(prenominal) compensation . It was alike(p) the family was expecting that someone pay financially for someone s death . Although , policy and compensation is a popular demeanor of placing financial value to someone s life , it still does non sound honest . Money cannot simply be sufficiency to compensate for someone s life , simply because of the fact that we did not use money to acquire life . Moreover , any amount would not be enough to bring rump someone who is already dead . Yet this is the expression companies , the governance , and the families left screw approach death of a soulfulness (RipleyInterestingly , William Shakespeargon , arguably the most influential writer of all time , presents a ancestor for determining the value of life . by means of the monologue of the ! regarded best dramatic character of all time , diminutive point , Shakespe ar laid down his argument . small town s soliloquy suggests to us that life is intrinsically full of misfortunes .

The character of Hamlet is contemplating suicide , as he views this as the only personal manner to free himself of life s misfortunes (Hamlet ,Prince of Denmark ,Act III ,Sc .1It counts like both Ripley and Shakespeare are arguing that life can only be minded(p) value through death . Moreover , their arguments are cogitate on the misfortunes of an individual . We know that life is full of misfortunes , and there are still just as more commanding points to being aliveBoth pieces are also suggesting that the social status of a person has much to do with the value life . Ripley had explored the brain : is there a difference between a unfortunate man and a rich man in cost of the value of life . Shakespeare is also seemingly suggesting the uniform motion as his protagonist , Hamlet , is belonging to a full(prenominal) social status - not to mention he is the prince of Denmark . except saddening to think , both authors maybe irrefutably right . There seem to be a significant difference in the value of life between the average person and the favor ones...If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper